A Contract of Guarantee as defined under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals with discharging the liability of the third person (principle debtor) in case he fails to keep his promise. The reason a contract of such nature exists is due to the probability of loss that creditor can suffer due to failure of abiding by the promise by the principle debtor. For such non-abidance, the surety will have to indemnify the creditor.
Contract of Guarantee is contingent in nature and depends upon the collateral undertaking. The liability or the burden on the surety is not primary but secondary in nature. The primary liability still lies on the principal debtor.
A contract of guarantee has a three-way contract. It involves three actors: creditor, the one to whom the principal debt is owed, the principal debtor who owes the debt to creditor and surety who takes guarantee on behalf of the principal debtor. Once the debt is paid to the creditor, the contract between the creditor, principal debtor and surety end there. A new contract between surety and principal debtor begins. The surety has complete right to ask the principal debtor pay him/her the money which is owed. So a contract of a principal debtor with a creditor, surety with creditor and debtor with surety sums it up to three contracts.
The essentials of Contract of Guarantee are:
Exception: In case of a minor, when the guarantee has been taken on behalf of the minor, the surety will be treated as the one having primary burden as a principal debtor. This is done for the convenience of serving justice since minors cannot enter into agreements. In case of a company, the Board of Directors is held liable in case they enter into a contract which is ultra-vires to the Memorandum of Association(MoA). They can be held liable and not the official person of the company.