In a seminal article titled “TOWARD A FAIR USE STANDARD” 103 HARV. L. REV. 1105 (1990) Judge Pierre N. Leval noted that: “The doctrine of honest use want not be so mysterious or dependent on intuitive judgments. Truthful use have to be perceived now not as a disorderly basket of exceptions to the rules of copyright, nor as a departure from the standards governing that body of regulation, but as a substitute as a rational, indispensable part of copyright, whose observance is important to reap the objectives of that law”. Honest use has to not be considered a weird, sometimes tolerated departure from the grand idea of the copyright monopoly. To the opposite, it's miles an essential part of the overall design. In brief stated, the use should be of a character that serves the copyright objective of stimulating productive thought and public preparation without excessively diminishing the incentives for creativity”. In finding the pre-history of copyright honest dealing a commentator notes: Prehistory is composed Largely of fair abridgment instances litigated in English courts of law and fairness among 1710 (the 12 months the first copyright act turned into enacted) and 1841. Abridgment the procedure of creating a shortened version or abstract of a longer text turned into common in this period, but its lawful scope became contested. An overview of early English copyright instances and other elements of the historical report result in considerable conclusions. The first is that statutory copyright, honestly from its inception, went nicely beyond simply mechanical acts of duplicate. Certainly, with the aid of the mid-eighteenth century, courts had all started to limit the permissibility of abridgments. The second perception is that there may be in fact good sized continuity between fair abridgment within the premodern generation and honest use inside the U.S.A these days. As a result a gadget of permitting truthful dealing with works in the shape of abridgments has taken lifestyles of its personal. parallel to what became occurring in the English courts, in one of the earliest selection on fair use-Falson v. Marsh (1841), judge story conceptualized the four issue take a look at because the guiding standards. “the question of piracy, often rely on a nice stability of the comparative use made in one of the materials of the other; the character, extent, and price of the substances thus used; the items of every work; and the diploma to which every writer may be pretty presumed to have resorted to the same commonplace sources of records, or to have exercised the equal common diligence within the selection and arrangement of the materials.” Segment fifty two of the Copyright Act, 1957 lays down an exhaustive listing of fair dealing factors. But, Padmanabhan (2012) has wondered if we need to truly take into account them as the conclusive guiding principles. Padmanabhan states phase fifty two via itself provides no steerage in this component. With the aid of searching in to in advance decisions like Blackwood v. Parasuraman ( 1959 madras), wherein the courtroom relied on positive elements (within the context of the then triumphing/relevant 1914 act) Just like the motive for which the copyright paintings is used and the way of use referring to such purpose. By using inspecting cutting-edge choices Padmanabhan questions whether or not courts can actually look past the exhaustive list and increase the remedy for the defendant. In doing so, Padmanabhan argued that it will likely be opposite to the goal of the parliament which legislated unique exceptions.